Mentalyc Alternatives: 5 Options for 2026 (Honest Fit Guide)
Comparing 5 Mentalyc alternatives for behavioral health in 2026 — Upheal, Freed, Blueprint, EHR-native AI, and PsyFi — with public pricing and a who-it's-for guide for each.
Read moreAn honest 2026 comparison of Upheal and PsyFiScribe for ambient AI session notes — public pricing, behavioral-health fit, multi-speaker capture, and how to decide which one matches your practice.
Upheal and PsyFiScribe solve overlapping but different problems. Upheal is a light all-in-one platform — ambient AI notes bundled with scheduling, telehealth, billing, and forms — and it bills usage-based at $1 per completed session, capped at $69/mo per provider. PsyFiScribe is a focused, behavioral-health-specific ambient scribe that captures the session and hands a structured draft to PsyFiGPT for drafting and chat. Choose Upheal if you want one platform to run the practice; choose PsyFiScribe if you want a documentation tool built around how behavioral-health clinicians actually write. Confirm a signed BAA before sending real PHI to either.
Ambient AI scribes have crossed from novelty to normal in behavioral health. The pitch is the same everywhere: stop typing during or after sessions, let the tool listen, get a structured draft you edit and sign. Once you accept that pitch, the real question is which tool to standardize on — and Upheal shows up on almost every shortlist.
Upheal is a capable, well-known option, and for plenty of practices it's the right answer. Clinicians start comparing it against alternatives like PsyFiScribe for a few practical reasons: they want a tool built specifically for behavioral health rather than a broad platform, they don't need the EHR-style scheduling and billing layer Upheal includes, or they want the capture surface and the drafting surface to be purpose-built for clinical documentation rather than bundled features.
This guide lays out both honestly — public pricing, where each genuinely fits, and how to decide. No tool wins on every axis. The goal is to match the tool to your practice, not to crown a "best."
A compliance note first: both tools handle protected health information, so a signed Business Associate Agreement (BAA) is non-negotiable. PsyFi's stance is HIPAA-aligned, BAA available — and you should demand the same in writing from Upheal or any vendor. For the full vetting checklist, see our guide to HIPAA-safe AI therapy notes.
Upheal moved to usage-based pricing in 2026: $1 per completed session, capped at $69/mo per provider, with a feature-limited free tier and a custom Enterprise plan. The cap is the headline — a slammed month and a slow month both top out at $69 per provider.
What you're paying for is breadth. Upheal positions itself as a light EHR: alongside the ambient AI notes, the paid plan bundles scheduling, telehealth, client billing, and intake forms. If you want a single platform to run the front and back office of a small practice, that all-in-one surface is a genuine strength — it means one login, one vendor, and one place for the practice to live.
Best for: solo clinicians and small practices that want one platform to handle scheduling, telehealth, billing, and notes together, and who like the predictability of a per-session cap.
PsyFiScribe takes the opposite approach: do documentation, do it specifically for behavioral health, and do it well rather than bundling a practice-management suite around it.
PsyFiScribe is an ambient scribe tuned for 1–4 speaker sessions — solo, couples, family, or interpreter-assisted — that produces a structured draft (chief complaint, history of present illness, mental status exam, treatment-plan starter). It doesn't stop at the transcript: a completed Scribe session can be pulled straight into PsyFiGPT, the drafting and chat surface, where you get behavioral-health SOAP/DAP/BIRP templates, voice and tone switching, encrypted memory, and shared team prompts. PsyFi is HIPAA-aligned, BAA available, with audit logging and clear data-handling controls. Plans start around $10/mo for solo clinicians and scale to team tiers.
Best for: clinicians who want documentation tooling designed around behavioral-health language and workflows — not a general platform with notes attached — and who like having the capture surface and the drafting surface speak to each other.
Here's where the two overlap most directly. The table below sticks to the documentation dimensions that matter when an ambient scribe is the thing you're actually buying.
| Dimension | Upheal | PsyFiScribe |
|---|---|---|
| Built specifically for behavioral health | Behavioral-health focused | Behavioral-health focused, with BH-specific note structure (CC, HPI, MSE, treatment-plan starter) |
| Multi-speaker capture | Supported | Tuned for 1–4 speakers (solo, couples, family, interpreter) |
| Note format flexibility | Supported | SOAP, DAP, BIRP, and custom formats via PsyFiGPT |
| Drafting + chat surface | Notes generation | Dedicated PsyFiGPT surface — pull a transcript into chat, switch voice/tone, reuse saved prompts |
| Encrypted memory across sessions | — | Yes |
| Documentation-only entry price | Bundled into the platform plan | From ~$10/mo for solo clinicians |
| HIPAA posture | BAA available (confirm in writing) | HIPAA-aligned, BAA available; audit logging |
The honest summary: if your decision is about the documentation engine itself, PsyFiScribe is built around behavioral-health structure and pairs with a purpose-built drafting surface. If your decision is about running the whole practice on one platform, Upheal's bundled scheduling, telehealth, and billing is a real advantage that a focused scribe doesn't try to match.
Say you're a solo clinician seeing 18 clients a week, including two couples. You already use a separate EHR you're happy with for scheduling and billing, and you only want to fix documentation. Here's the decision most clinicians in that spot actually run:
That discipline — name the problem, model real cost, test on consented sessions — works no matter which tool you land on.
If you're weighing a broader set of tools, our Mentalyc alternatives guide covers Upheal, Freed, Blueprint, EHR-native AI, and PsyFi side by side with current pricing.
Whichever you choose, the rules don't change: demand a signed BAA, test with consented real sessions before you trust the output, and treat every AI draft as a draft until a licensed clinician reviews and signs it.
This post compares publicly listed pricing as of June 2026; confirm current pricing and BAA terms directly with each vendor. Nothing here is legal advice — consult your compliance lead.